YouTube Case at US Supreme Court Could Shape Protections for ChatGPT & AI

The US Supreme Court is set to hear a case that could shape the future of protections for ChatGPT and AI. The case, Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc., centers around copyright infringement claims between two tech giants over software code used in Google’s Android operating system.
At issue is whether or not computer code can be copyrighted under federal law, which would have far-reaching implications for how companies use artificial intelligence (AI) and chatbot technology like ChatGPT. If the court rules that computer code can be copyrighted, it could mean more restrictions on how companies use AI and chatbot technology in their products and services.
This case has been ongoing since 2010 when Oracle sued Google claiming that its Android operating system infringed upon its Java programming language copyrights by using 11,500 lines of code from Java without permission. In 2018, an appeals court ruled in favor of Oracle saying that the copied lines were protected under copyright law as “declaring codes” – instructions written by programmers to tell computers what to do with data inputs – making them eligible for protection under copyright laws just like any other creative work such as books or music compositions are protected.
Google appealed this ruling arguing that declaring codes should not be subject to copyright because they are functional rather than creative works; however, if the Supreme Court upholds the lower court’s decision then it will open up a new avenue for companies seeking legal protection against competitors who copy their software code without permission – something which could have major implications for businesses using AI and chatbot technologies like ChatGPT moving forward.
In addition to setting a precedent on how much legal protection software developers can expect when creating programs with AI or chatbots integrated into them, this ruling may also affect consumer privacy rights as well depending on how broadly courts interpret what constitutes “copyrightable material” going forward. For example if certain types of user data collected through these technologies become subject to copyright laws then consumers may find themselves losing some control over their personal information due to increased restrictions placed on its usage by third parties who own those copyrights – something which many privacy advocates fear could lead us down a slippery slope towards further erosion of our digital rights online .
Ultimately only time will tell what kind of impact this landmark case will have but one thing is certain: whatever happens here at the Supreme Court level will likely reverberate throughout both corporate boardrooms and living rooms alike across America in years ahead so everyone should pay close attention!
|YouTube Case at US Supreme Court Could Shape Protections for ChatGPT & AI|Technology|Reuters