The use of facial recognition software in policing has been a controversial topic for years, and it’s only becoming more so. This technology is being used to identify suspects in criminal cases, but there are serious concerns about its accuracy when it comes to people of color. Detroit City Council President Pro Tem Porcha Woodruff recently proposed legislation that would ban the use of facial recognition software by police departments in her city.
Woodruff’s proposal was prompted by reports from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) which found that this type of technology had an error rate as high as 98% when identifying Black people. The ACLU also noted that these errors were not evenly distributed across all races; instead, they disproportionately affected African Americans and other minority groups. This means that innocent people could be falsely accused or arrested based on inaccurate information provided by facial recognition software.
In addition to the potential inaccuracy of this technology, there are also ethical considerations at play here. Critics argue that using facial recognition software can lead to racial profiling and discrimination against certain communities who may already feel targeted by law enforcement agencies due to their race or ethnicity. Furthermore, some worry about how much data is collected through this type of surveillance system and whether or not it violates privacy rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
Despite these concerns, many cities have adopted facial recognition systems for their police departments with mixed results thus far. In Detroit specifically, Woodruff believes her proposed ban will help protect citizens from false accusations while still allowing officers to do their jobs effectively without relying too heavily on potentially flawed technology like facial recognition software . She hopes her bill will set a precedent for other cities looking into similar measures regarding biometric identification tools used in law enforcement contexts .
Woodruff’s efforts come at a time when public scrutiny over police practices is higher than ever before , making it even more important for lawmakers like herself to take action now rather than later . If passed , her legislation could serve as an example for other municipalities considering similar bans on the use of biometric technologies such as face-recognition algorithms within their own jurisdictions . It remains unclear if any changes will actually be made , but one thing is certain: Facial Recognition Software must be regulated carefully if we want our civil liberties protected going forward .
|Are You Kidding Carjacking?: The Problem With Facial Recognition In Policing|Technology|The Guardian